Social and Political Factors in Actualizing New Anti-Corruption Movement Through Online Community in Indonesia

Ponco Budi Sulistyo


This research aimed to analyze the social and political factors that can realize the anti-corruption movement that utilized new media platform, in this case social media Facebook in Indonesia. This research conducted in-depth interviews with 15 active members including the administrators and five experts. The research found that factors that had realized the anti-corruption movement through online communities on social media Facebook was the emergence of social collective awareness, political system of Indonesia which tend to open, and in terms of culture, the Indonesian people are generally easier to establish a relationship of friendship, the increasing of economic caused people to be able to buy a need to communicate and socialize, political literacy which tend to increase and the psychological condition of Indonesian society in general that have long been disappointed with their leaders who committed with act of corruption and indecisive in dealing with corruption cases.


social movement, online community, social media.

Full Text:



Aronowitz, S. et. al. (Ed.). 1996. Technoscience and Cyberculture. New York: Routledge.

Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approach. London: Sage.

Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

De la Piscina, R.T. (2007). Social Movements in the Public Sphere: New Forms of Communication Arise and Transgress Old Communication Codes. Zer English Edition.

Humphreys, L. (2010). Mobile Social Networks and Urban Public Space. New Media & Society August 2010 12: 763-778. London: Sage Publications.

Kaplan, A.M.danHaenlein, M. (2010)Users of the World, Unite! The Challenges and Oopportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons. 53 (1). p. 59-68.

Kietzmann, H., Jan, Hermkens, Kristopher. (2011). Social Media? Get Serious! Understanding the Functional Building Blocks of Social Media. Business Horizons. p. 241–251.

Kushin, M. J. and Kitchener, K. (2009). Getting Political on Social Network Sites: Exploring Online Political Discourse on Facebook. First Monday. 14 (11).

Locher, D.D. (2002). Collective Behavior. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

McAdam, D. (1982). Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency 1930 – 1970. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

McLuhan, M. (1997). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Men. London and New York: Routledge.

Melluci, A. (1989). Nomads of the Present. London: Hutchinson Radius.

Moog, S. and Sluyter-Beltaro, J. (2001). The Transformation of Political Communication? In Axford & Huggins (Ed.). New Media and Politics. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

Monnier, C. (2010). What are Social Movements? Retrieved from

Mulyana, A. and Morrisan. (2015). Civility On Social Media (The Tendency of Politeness Level of Internet Users on Social Media).

Preece, J. (2000) Online Communities: Designing Usability, Supporting Sociability. West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Rheingold, H. (1994). A Slice of Life in My Virtual Community. InHarasim, L.M. (Ed.), Global Networks: Computers and International Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Shaw, D.B. (2008).Technoculture: The Key Concepts. Oxford, New York: Berg.

Slevin, J. (2000). The Internet and Society. Cambridge, UK: Pility Press.

Sulistyo, P.B. and Azmawati, A. A. (2016). The Roles of Facebook in Creating New Anti Corruption Social Movement Through Online Community In Indonesia. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications. Volume 6, Issue 7, July 2016. p. 33-37.

Tarrow, S. (1998). Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wilkinson, P. (1971). Social Movement: Key Concept in Political Science. London: MacMillan.

Yin, R. K. (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.


  • There are currently no refbacks.