Freedom and Choice in Heterosexual Relationships in Simone de Beauvoir’s Les Mandarins

Ndidiamaka Ononuju Ejechi


Abstract: Previous studies focused on Simone de Beauvoir as the precursor and proponent of modern French feminism but virtually ignored the author’s core existentialist principles of freedom and choice in human relationships, particularly in heterosexuality. It is this unique angle that de Beauvoir has chosen for representing and sustaining her position in scholarship that this study sets out to explore.  Thus, the study adopts the French ‘explication de texte’ as its methodology and attempts to portray the deep structures which are male/female relationships with differing levels of commitment. Using Existentialism and Feminism as its major theoretical framework the study does a content analysis of the selected narrative, Les Mandarins.  It is discovered in the study that in their relationships, both male and female characters act according to their personal choice, not feeling obliged to follow social conventions. The findings also reveal that regardless of whether characters are in extra-marital or non-marital relationships, they readily accept responsibility for their choice.  



sexual freedom, existentialism, choice, heterosexuality, responsibility.

Full Text:




Beauvoir de, Simone. L’invitée. Paris : Editions Gallimard, 1943.

-------------------- Le sang des autres. Paris : Editions Gallimard, 1945.

-------------------- Les mandarins. Paris : Editions Gallimard, 1954.

-------------------- Les belles images. Paris : Editions Gallimard, 1966.

Berdychevsky, Lisa, Poria, Yaniv and Uriely, Natan. Sexual behavior in women’s tourist experiences: Motivations, behaviors and meanings. Tourism Management 35, 2013, 144-155.

Cohen, Keith and Cohen, Paula. Trans. “The Laugh of the Meduza” in Marks, Elaine &

De Courtivron Isabelle. New French Feminisms Massachusetts: University of Massachusetts Press, 1980.

Curthoys, Ann. Adventures of Feminism: Simone de Beauvoir’s Autobiographies,

Women’s Liberation, and Self-Fashioning. Feminist Review, 64, Feminism 2000:, 3-18 Palgrave Macmillan Journals.

Eagleton, Mary. Ed. Feminist Literary Theory: A Reader. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986.

Echols, Alice. Daring to be Mad: Radical Feminism in America’s 1967-1975 University.

of Minnesota Press, 1990.

Firestone, Shulamith. The Dialectics of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution. New York: William Marrow.

Fragonard, Marie-Madeleine. 1981. Précis d’histoire de la littétature française. Paris: Les Éditions Didier.

Kempwirth, Karen. Feminism and the Legacy of Revolution: Nicaragua, El- Salvador,

Chiapas : The Historical Background In Jo Freeman Ed. Women: A Feminist Perspective.


Marks, Elaine. and de Courtivron, Isabelle. New French Feminisms. Massachusetts: University of Massachusetts Press, 1980.

Mathews, J. Bisexuality in the male. The Journal of Sex Research 5:2 126-129. 1969.

Moi, Toril. French Feminist Thought: A Reader. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Inc. 1987

Ojaruega, Enajite. Feminist Perspectives and Intra-gender Conflict in Tess Onwueme’s

Tell It To Women. 2012. 197-206.

Omoregbe, Joseph. A Simplified History of Western Philosophy. Lagos: Joja Educational

Research & Publishers, 2012.

Pilcher, Jane.and Whelehan, Imelda. 50 Key Concepts in Gender Studies. London: SAGE

Publishers Ltd, 2004.

Tomes, Arnaud. L’existentialisme est un humanisme. Paris : Ellipses. 2009.

Tyson Lois. Critical Theory Today: A User-Friendly Guide. New York: Garland

Publishing. 1999.

Vintges, Karen. Simone de Beauvoir: A Feminist Thinker for Our Times. Hypatia, Inc


_________‘Must we burn Foucault?’ Ethics as art of living: Simone de Beauvoir and Michel Foucault. Continental Philosophy Review June 2001,Vol, 34, 2, 165-181. Retrieved from


  • There are currently no refbacks.